This morning veteran BBC presenter John Humphrys dared to tell the truth about Thomas Mair, who murdered Labour MP Jo Cox last year – but his honesty has provoked outrage among the politically correct establishment.
On this morning’s flagship Radio 4 programme Today, Humphrys was interviewing Mark Rowley, Scotland Yard’s top anti-terrorism officer.
Mair was never charged with terrorism – due to the total absence of any evidence connecting him to serious political activity – but opportunistic liar, cocaine abuser and FBI informant Todd Blodgett succeeded in selling lies to several news organisations, falsely claiming that Mair had attended a high-level nationalist gathering in London linked to H&D editor Mark Cotterill.
Scotland Yard’s Rowley made a vague reference during today’s interview, saying:
“We know that extreme right-wing related issues led to the tragic murder of Jo Cox not that long ago.”
Humphrys instantly corrected him:
“In that case wasn’t it that he was a very deeply disturbed man, mentally ill wasn’t he? It slightly muddies the water doesn’t it when we talk about that as terrorism? That was a murder wasn’t it?”
Cue howls of outrage from dishonest or ignorant Labourites, including former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.
Most of the UK media has been responsible in accurately reporting that Thomas Mair – convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment this week for murdering Labour MP Jo Cox – had no involvement with nationalist parties or groups.
Unfortunately one or two other media outlets (notably ITV News and the Daily Telegraph) have behaved disgracefully by repeating the blatant lies of Todd Blodgett, an FBI informant and crack cocaine addict whose first appearance on the political scene was as part of a male prostitution ring involving fellow drug abusers and perverts in the Reagan White House.
H&D‘s Mark Cotterill dealt with Blodgett’s lies in detail many weeks ago. (PDF courtesy of Financial Times.) To recap briefly for Fleet Street’s hard of thinking: Todd Blodgett claims to have met Thomas Mair at a meeting of prominent British nationalists in 2000. While Blodgett did travel to London to attend such a meeting, it was in 1998 (not 2000) and Thomas Mair did not attend. In fact to the best of our knowledge Mair never attended any nationalist meeting or activity – and most certainly would not have been invited to a gathering of high-level activists, since no-one had ever met him or knew anything about him.
Aside from ordering books and other items from a U.S. based mail order firm, and subscribing to a South African journal run by Alan Harvey (one of the most pro-Israel and anti-“nazi” individuals in the pro-White movement), Mair had no contact with any nationalists in the UK or abroad.
Law enforcement agencies on both sides of the Atlantic now have questions to answer.
- Have any UK police or security agencies encouraged the use of Blodgett’s lies by briefing British journalists about non-existent “ties” between Mair and nationalist groups?
- Assuming that Blodgett reported back to his FBI paymasters following his 1998 trip to London, did the FBI share this information with MI5 and Scotland Yard? If so, then both British and American agencies have known for 18 years the full attendance list from that meeting: and know perfectly well that Mair wasn’t there. Has the FBI briefed journalists with the true story, or have they collaborated in the lies?
- We now know that Blodgett was working for the FBI by about the turn of the millennium – but was he reporting to the FBI at any earlier stage? Specifically, was he working for the FBI when he was part of the White House vice ring in 1988? Was Blodgett’s involvement with male prostitution and illegal drugs (including cocaine) sanctioned by the FBI?
Some left-liberal journalists have complained that Thomas Mair was not charged with terrorist offences, and have suggested that this indicated bias by the police and prosecutors, who would not have hesitated to charge a Muslim with “terrorism” in similar circumstances. Senior police officers have been bumbling and evasive in their response to these complaints.
It’s time for the police to admit the simple reason why they didn’t charge Mair with terrorism. Had they done so, they would have been required in court to establish the extent of Mair’s political involvement. They could not do so because there was no such involvement. Even the much publicised contents of Mair’s bookshelf were not “nazi” books – they were books by “mainstream” authors (including Jews such as Deborah Lipstadt and Gerald Posner) about national socialist / racialist / conspiracy theory topics.
The simple truth is that Mair was a nutter not a “nazi”. For a combination of political and financial reasons, it has suited the likes of Todd Blodgett and his former paymasters in the secret world to pretend otherwise.
A Paris court on Tuesday this week gave Prof. Robert Faurisson – an 87-year-old half-French, half Scot who was Professor of French Literature at the University of Lyon – a four-month suspended jail sentence and a €4,000 fine. Judgement on a further charge will be given later this week.
The circumstances of Prof. Faurisson’s trial were explained at a meeting of the London Forum in July 2016 by Lady Michèle Renouf, who was the sole defence witness alongside Prof. Faurisson at his Paris trial.
In September 2016 Prof. Faurisson was convicted under the French “racial hatred” law for the 60-word sentence translated below: the Paris court taking the extraordinary view that his reference to “the State of Israel and international Zionism” amounted to an illegal attack on Jews as a “race”.
For this “offence” Prof. Faurisson received a 4 month suspended prison sentence and a fine of €4,000. He was ordered in addition to pay €5,000 in compensation and costs to LICRA, a French association combatting “racism and anti-semitism”.
Two additional charges under the French “Gayssot Act” prohibiting “Holocaust denial”, which related specifically to Prof. Faurisson’s Tehran conference speech, were set aside.
Prof. Faurisson immediately announced his intention to appeal against this latest conviction: an appeal which is of the highest importance for historical and political researchers worldwide, and in particular for anyone campaigning against the policies of the Israeli Government. It would seem that the latest judgement opens the way for any robust criticism of Israel to be criminalised in France as anti-Jewish “racial hatred”, even if neither Jews nor Judaism have been mentioned!
Further reports and analysis of this case will appear in the next edition of Heritage and Destiny.
An earlier interview with Prof. Robert Faurisson can be seen below (including English subtitles), in which he explains the background to his famous 60-word French sentence summarising his research conclusions. Prof. Faurisson’s words (again criminalised by the Paris court this week), read in English:
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
Manny Carpel is a name well-known to many H&D readers. In November 1963 he was one of a team of “anti-fascist” Jews who tricked their way into the flat of historian David Irving, aiming to steal documents. Then 20-year-old Carpel was ultimately fined £20. He told the court that he and fellow accused Gerry Gable (now editor of Searchlight) had been looking for “secret documents” in Irving’s possession, and added that “we are anti-fascists but not members of any movement”.
In fact Gable and Carpel were operatives of the 62 Group, an alliance of Zionist Jews and violent communists. In charge of fundraising for the 62 Group was Gerald Ronson, who later founded the Zionist lobby group Community Security Trust.
In 1980 Carpel carried out an arson attack at the Uckfield printworks run by the late Tony Hancock.
Now in his 70s, Carpel has yet to retire from his life of crime. Earlier this year he was sentenced to 3 years and 4 months in prison for his role in a major drug conspiracy, targeted by the South West regional organised crime unit.
During this police operation, drugs (cannabis, heroin and amphetamines) and various paraphernalia, including weighing scales and gloves were seized.
In charge of the conspiracy was Bekir Arif, a member of Britain’s leading crime family.
Some of you may have seen the article – “Accused British Assassin Thomas Mair Attended Racists’ 2000 Meeting” on the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Centre) website on June 19th.
The article was written by the SPLC’s top honcho Mark Potok but the story was provided by one Todd Blodgett, a former employee of the Reagan White House administration, John Whitehouse, Liberty Lobby, Resistance Records, and now it seems the FBI!
Blodgett – whom I once knew very well as my employer, friend and fellow racial-nationalist from 1998 to 2002 – has sadly sold his soul again to the SPLC: for money for a few more lines of cocaine no doubt.
Potok (who was never one to let truth get in the way of a good story) and Blodgett then came up with the tale of Thomas Mair’s supposed links to the nationalist movement in general and the National Alliance in particular, which it is claimed brought him down to London for a “racist meeting” in May 2000.
So desperate for a few more bucks to feed his habit(s), Blodgett has invented the whole story about Thomas Mair attending this racist meeting and how Todd met and talked to him there. And how I, with my vast network of racist contacts in the UK supposedly organised the whole event from my ground-floor apartment (flat) in Falls Church, Northern Virginia. A story which the SPLC bought (literally!) from him!
Now to give Blodgett some credit he did attend a meeting of some 15-20 racial nationalist activists near the Strand, in central London – but it was not organised by me and it was certainly not in May 2000. The meeting was in fact organised by Nick Griffin, then unofficial number two in the BNP to the late John Tyndall, and was held sometime during 1998.
At that time Blodgett was working for Willis Carto at Liberty Lobby, and not as he now claims for Dr. William Pierce of the National Alliance. Carto had purchased Resistance Records from Jason Snow and George Burdi/Hawthorne a year or so beforehand but later wanted to sell it on. (I guess he did not wish his Spotlight newspaper to be associated with Skinheads anymore.)
Blodgett was in fact the middle man between Willis Carto and William Pierce (who by the way hated each other, so would not deal with each other directly – so they did the deal via Todd Blodgett, who may or may not have taken a small cut for his trouble).
Griffin with the help of then Scottish BNP activist Stevie Cartwright (Blodgett got that bit right too) got together 15 to 20 of the main players in the Nationalist music scene, who were also sympathetic to Griffin and his future challenge for the BNP leadership, to meet Blodgett and hear his plans for expanding Resistance Records into Britain and the European Market.
Whether his FBI controllers were with Blodgett at the London meeting is unknown but if I were a gambling man I would say it was very, very doubtful because:
(a) I doubt very much that he was an FBI informant back in 1998 and
(b) the American Spooks did not really take that much notice or interest in us (what they would call the far-right) until after 9/11 – and after 9/11 of course it all went rather mental!
Anyway, back to the London meeting in the Strand in 1998 (not 2000). One thing is clear after 18 years: Thomas Mair was not at that meeting, he had not been invited, and in fact nobody had ever heard of him! The meeting was for the top / key players in the scene – Mair was not even IN the scene!
Blodgett made up the story that Mair was there and fed (sold) it to the SPLC, who in turn passed it on to news agencies around the world – including our very own BBC – who have now called me twice to find out more about this Thomas Mair chap.
Amongst his fairy tales Blodgett claims that Mair was “loosely affiliated with the Leeds chapter of the National Alliance”. The NA never had a Leeds Chapter – in fact they never even had a UK chapter, though a now deceased individual in the Leeds area ran a mail order book service with NA connections. Around that time – 1998-2000 – the NA may have had 20 to 30 members in the whole of the UK, and that’s tops. They were not organised as chapters and in most cases did not even know each other.
My guess is (and I must stress this is only a guess) is that Mair knew somebody in the Batley area (maybe an NF or BNP member) who got him some flyers and/or catalogues from the NA. This person may have got these at a local NF/BNP meeting, where fringe literature from the USA was often (unofficially) passed around.
Potok goes on in his article about Mair subscribing to a “pro-apartheid South African publication”. The magazine that Mair did in fact subscribe to was South African Patriot In Exile (SAPIE) – published by one Alan Harvey, from his mother’s house in Herne Bay on the Kent coast – many, many miles away from South Africa.
Mair, in a letter he sent to SAPIE which was published in issue #31 in 1992, claimed he first got hold of their magazine via the NF. He did not say whether he wrote off to the NF and bought it from them (they did sell South African Patriot [the forerunner to SAPIE] at the time) or if he bought it at a local NF meeting in Yorkshire. Mair had a further letter published by SAPIE in issue #35 in 1995.
Strangely Potok does not mention that SAPIE was very pro-Zionist and very anti-Nazi (and still is as far as I’m aware) or that its editor Alan Harvey describes himself as “101% pro-Israel”. I guess that would not tie in well with his claims that Mair was a “neo-Nazi”.
Further on in the article Blodgett claims that Richard Barnbrook was at this “secret meeting” supposedly held in May 2000. Barnbrook first appeared on the Nationalist scene in the summer of 2000 where he was the official cameraman at the BNP’s inaugural Red, White and Blue Festival near Oswestry. Barnbrook later came to fame when he became the first (and only) BNP member to be elected to the Greater London Assembly in 2008. As I pointed out earlier the London meeting was in fact held in 1998, and Barnbrook was not there. I doubt he was even a member of the BNP then.
Potok goes on in the next paragraph to say that I was “later deported (from the USA) for his activities”. Well as anybody with half a brain cell can find out by going online, I have never been deported from the USA – or any other country for that matter. But as I said earlier, Potok was never one to let the truth get in the way of a good story.
Just for the record I was handed a 10-year exclusion order from an immigration judge in Arlington County, Virginia in September 2002. The judge gave me three months to vacate the USA, as I had my home, job and wife there, so we needed plenty of time to sort things out. I vacated the USA with my wife Jenny at the start of November 2002 and have never returned since.
Ok, back to the “secret meeting”. Potok claims that Dr. William Pierce (leader of the NA) “had recently bought Resistance Records”. This is another lie: at the time of the meeting RR was still owned by Willis Carto.
Potok further states that he (Pierce) “would soon be releasing an electronic game to be called Ethnic Cleansing.” Another whopper of a lie here. That game was released in 2002, four years after that “secret meeting”. So ask yourself who could or would have been “giddy” (as Blodgett and Potok claim) about an electronic game that had not even been invented yet and was still four years from release?
After having spoken to Stevie Cartwright at some length about the “secret meeting” in London’s Strand back in 1998 (his memories of the era are a lot clearer than mine, well I am 55 going on 56 now!) he can categorically state that Blodgett knew no one personally at all who was invited to that meeting, either by name or by description. That being so he would not have known whether Thomas Mair had been there or not, which of course he wasn’t anyway.
Another fact exposing the lie that this meeting was held in 2000 was the fact that when Stevie Cartwright came to the USA in March 1999 to do a series of speeches and “house meetings” he also did some work in Todd Blodgett’s temporary Resistance Records office in the Woodley Park area of Washington DC. Stevie was renewing his acquaintance with Todd whom he had met before at that London meeting. So how on earth could that meeting have been in 2000? A complete nonsense!
If the truth be known, and that’s REAL truth – not some Cock and Bull Story made up by Potok and Blodgett – it might well be that Thomas Mair did have an interest in racial-nationalism, and that’s why he bought papers, magazines and books from a whole host of what the BBC would describe as “Far-Right” groups – including the National Alliance, South African Patriot and the National Front.
However, that does not make Mair a right-wing/nationalist/neo-Nazi (or whatever you want to call it) activist. Far from it, Mair was what some in our movement used to call an “arm-chair nationalist”, but now would more likely be called a “keyboard warrior”, i.e. he was the opposite of an activist – a non-activist in fact. He did nothing at all for the nationalist cause or movement in the past 15 to 20 years.
And the first time we hear of him is when he is accused of murdering the Labour MP Jo Cox on Thursday 16th June 2016.
As Todd Blodgett has chosen to put himself at the centre of this ridiculous conspiracy, either for monetary gain or as a favour to his handlers, then surely any prosecuting lawyer worth his salt would call Blodgett as a witness to the character and alleged “prejudices” of Tommy Mair. However, once the details are looked into and examined at length it would be blatantly clear that this was simply a fiction from the fevered mind of a criminal liar, fantasist and traitor who has been egged on by his bosom buddies in the SPLC hate group.
Now as anybody in the movement who knows me can tell you, I’m not one for conspiracy theories and never have been: but something is just not right here. I can’t quite put my finger on it, but I – or somebody better than me – will. The real truth about Thomas Mair will come out. So Mark Potok – watch this space!
Mark Cotterill, editor, Heritage and Destiny
PS: In a few days time Heritage and Destiny will publish a further exposé of the SPLC/FBI hired liar and crook Todd Blodgett.
National Alliance National Office
Box 172 • Laurel Bloomery • TN 37680 • USA
natall.com • nationalvanguard.org
June 17, 2016
The National Alliance is an educational organization working for the long-term interests of White people worldwide. It was founded by physics professor Dr. William Pierce in the 1970s. Its current Chairman is former Green Beret Captain William White Williams.
On June 16, yesterday, a British Member of Parliament, Jo Cox, was fatally shot and stabbed on the street in her constituency. Police have arrested a suspect, Thomas Mair, in connection with the murder. The motive for the murder is not known, and one eyewitness, Hithem Ben Abdallah, says that MP Cox only became involved after an altercation had already begun.
A violence-linked, anti-White, Jewish-run organization calling itself the “Southern Poverty Law Center” (SPLC) immediately claimed to be in possession of private records showing that Thomas Mair purchased books some 17 years ago from National Vanguard Books, a book publisher and retailer associated with the National Alliance.
Within hours of the murder, the well-funded Jewish group released redacted copies of book sales receipts indicating, assuming they have not been altered by the SPLC, that Mair bought books from National Vanguard Books many years ago. We believe these records were obtained illegally. An SPLC spokeswoman, Heidi Beirich, has openly stated in an interview aired on PBS, that her organization’s goal is to “end” the National Alliance. Like a rogue intelligence agency, the SPLC commonly uses paid informants and infiltrators and unethically offers money to obtain private documents — as in this case — even if those documents are illegally obtained and not the property of those being paid by the Jewish group. We believe these are actionable and criminal acts.
The SPLC has a history of making false claims about the National Alliance (and many other groups), famously — and ludicrously — alleging, for example, that William Pierce’s 1978 novel The Turner Diaries was a “blueprint” for the Oklahoma City Bomber, Timothy McVeigh, a man whose partner in crime was involved in an interracial marriage and who was thus totally at odds with the ideas and purposes of the Alliance.
• The National Alliance scrupulously protects the names and other private information of all its supporters and customers. The theft or fraudulent obtaining and release of our records is, in our view, criminal, wrong, unethical, and harmful. The damage to freedom of speech, freedom to share ideas, and freedom of political expression caused by the SPLC and its paid operatives is incalculable.
• The National Alliance is a strictly legal organization and has always warned its members against illegal activity.
• National Vanguard Books has sold many hundreds of thousands of books to hundreds of thousands of customers over the years. We do not screen our customers any more than do Barnes and Noble or Amazon
— and, for some reason or other, no lurid headlines or SPLC press releases result when a killer or other criminal is found to have obtained books — even controversial, provocative books — from Barnes and Noble or his local library. If they did, civil libertarians would be outraged at the invasion of privacy and possible chilling effect on free speech — as they should be in this case too.
• The SPLC published a one-page excerpt from the main book in question allegedly sold to Mair, which shows how a home-made gun can be constructed. The book is entitled _Improvised Munitions
Handbook_. The SPLC (and the media outlets who republished the SPLC’s claims) dishonestly failed to mention that the book is _not_ a National Alliance publication, but is actually a publication of
the United States government. It is in fact a US Army training manual and is widely available online — for example, via http://gunfreezone.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/improvised-munitions-handbook.pdf
It is also available from major booksellers, such as Amazon.com:
The National Alliance had and has no connection with Thomas Mair any more than with any other book customer; we did not work with him, were not familiar with him, and did not remember his name even
after the release of the illegally-obtained book receipts.
Similarly, we were totally unfamiliar with Jo Cox until the news stories about her tragic end came to our attention. The National Alliance is politically neither pro-Labour Party nor anti-Labour Party, disagreeing with that party on many but far from all issues, and welcoming that party’s increasingly critical stance toward Jewish and Zionist power in recent years. We recently republished an essay suggesting that racially-conscious Whites in Britain should join the Labour Party.
We offer our condolences to Jo Cox’s family and loved ones and to the British people as a whole.
Vanessa Neubauer, Correspondence Secretary
After Napoleon had a French prince summarily executed in 1804, a contemporary French statesman commented: “It is worse than a crime, it is a mistake”.
If (as seems likely) the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox this afternoon was committed by someone thinking they were acting out of a patriotic motive, then this horrific murder could be described in similar terms.
For a political killing is not like any other crime: it is no disrespect to Mrs Cox’s family to say that such a murder transcends individuals. It is intended to have a wider impact: yet that impact is certain to be the opposite of what the deluded gunman intended.
Of the ten MPs or ex-MPs murdered during the past hundred years, seven were killed by IRA terrorists, one by petty criminals claiming to belong to a “black power” movement in Bermuda, and one by a homosexual serial killer. The tenth – former Tory MP and Cabinet minister Lord Moyne – was murdered by the Jewish terrorist group Lehi (better known as the Stern Gang) who also killed his driver, Lance Corporal Arthur Fuller.
All of the previous politically motivated assassins of MPs or ex-MPs during the past century eventually achieved their objectives. Indeed the Jewish assassins of Lord Moyne (although executed by the British authorities) were later exhumed by the State of Israel: their bodies lay in state in the “Jerusalem Hall of Heroism” before being buried with full military honours in a state funeral on Mount Herzl.
Why therefore do we say that the killing of Jo Cox is a political mistake which will have wider and more damaging consequences than the crime itself?
Simply because the present state of British politics and society – while undoubtedly grim – does not amount to a revolutionary situation. Despite frequent pious denials, there was (and remains) a substantial base of support for Sinn Fein / IRA within the Irish Catholic population; to an even greater extent, the majority of Jews worldwide supported anti-British terrorism during the 1940s (and still venerate the memory of the terrorists involved).
Whatever their views on immigration or Brexit, hardly any Britons believe it is time to shoot MPs (with the possible exception of Sinn Fein MPs).
Despite all the problems presented by unjust laws, there are still many political opportunities for nationalists in modern Britain. Paramilitary posing (of the sort indulged in by Britain First et al.) and foolish online incitements to violence can only be counter-productive.
The immediate political effect of Jo Cox’s murder might well be to swing the balance in favour of a ‘Remain’ vote in next week’s referendum. We must hope that the longer term effect will be to cure the fringe elements of nationalism of their addiction to pointless rhetoric and Hollywood theatrics.
UPDATE: While Tommy Mair – the alleged assassin of Jo Cox MP – is said by witnesses to have shouted “Britain First” while committing the murder, there seems so far to be no evidence of a direct connection between Mair and the political group Britain First, led by former BNP official Paul Golding. Mair’s only established UK political connection is with South African Patriot in Exile, published by former NF member Alan Harvey since 1991. Mr Harvey was always an eccentric and marginal figure in our movement and no longer has any connection with racial nationalism – indeed Mair’s own position on racial questions is rather mysterious, since he apparently has a black half-brother. However in the early hours of Friday morning the U.S. ‘anti-fascist’ group Southern Poverty Law Center published what appear to be genuine documents showing that Mair had purchased material from the National Alliance, the best known racial nationalist organisation in the U.S.. These purchases date back more than a decade, and there is no suggestion of any connection between Mair and the present NA organisation.
Today’s Mail on Sunday reveals a complex scandal concerning Baroness Scotland – now Secretary General of the Commonwealth – and her cosy relationship with a wealthy public relations fixer who faces being stripped of his knighthood.
H&D readers will remember Baroness Scotland as the Attorney General in Gordon Brown’s government from 2007 to 2010, who disgraced her office by colluding with the German government in its efforts to extradite Australian academic Dr Fredrick Töben.
These efforts were ultimately blocked by a British court in October 2008, allowing Dr Töben to return to Australia, but only after British nationalists and other supporters of academic freedom had to raise an astonishing £100,000 as cash security for Dr Töben’s bail pending his appeal. See report on the case here, and the eventual victory here.
The German government’s attempt to prosecute Dr Töben were only possible because Britain had signed up to the European Arrest Warrant system, which allowed government’s to apply for extradition from fellow European countries without having to go through the old procedures of a full extradition hearing into the facts of the case.
Most importantly the new system scrapped the principle of “dual criminality”, which ensured that one could only be extradited from the UK if accused of something that would have been a crime if committed here.
Dr Töben’s “crime” would certainly not have been illegal here: he was wanted in Germany under that country’s notoriously oppressive laws restricting what historians, scientists or indeed anyone else can say about certain historical topics.
Specifically Dr Töben had disputed the orthodox historical account of the supposed homicidal gas chambers which are alleged to have killed several million Jews during the Second World War, supposedly on the orders of Adolf Hitler. No one has been able to find any document from Adolf Hitler ordering such a mass murder, nor has anyone answered the famous challenge of Prof. Robert Faurisson (a French expert on documentary analysis) who asked: “show me or draw me a Nazi gas chamber”.
Nevertheless Dr Töben would assuredly have faced several years in a German prison cell had he been extradited under a European Arrest Warrant – for something that is not a crime in our country!
Earlier in her career the same Baroness Scotland – who as Attorney General was responsible for colluding with her German counterparts in the attempted judicial kidnapping of Dr Töben – had been the Home Office minister responsible for piloting the new EAW system through the House of Lords.
She specifically assured Parliament in 2003 that revisionist historians such as Dr. Töben would not be subject to extradition under European Arrest Warrants for publishing their views on the internet. Yet five years later she allowed her senior officials to proceed with exactly the type of extradition which she had promised Parliament could never take place.
Had there been any sense of honour in politics, Baroness Scotland would have resigned as Attorney General following the Töben case in 2008, yet she remained until Labour lost office in 2010 and has since been promoted (under a Tory government!) to the position of Commonwealth Secretary-General. God knows what our Commonwealth partners in Australia, New Zealand and Canada are supposed to make of this latest demeaning of high office.
In 2009 she survived public outrage and remained Attorney General even after having been found to employ an illegal immigrant as her housekeeper. Baroness Scotland was fined £5,000 for this offence but kept her job: though to his credit her parliamentary private secretary (Labour MP Stephen Hesford) resigned in protest, saying she should have quit or been sacked.
The latest scandal exposed today by The Mail on Sunday might just halt the Baroness’s meteoric rise, but as all nationalists know – “Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
We are not surprised to see that the Baroness’s disgraced associate “Sir” Anthony Bailey is one of the leading campaigners for British membership of the European Union, and was a big donor to David Miliband’s failed campaign for Labour leader.
A 40-year old Blackburn man, described by his teenage girlfriend as ‘controlling’ subjected her to two brutal assaults in the space of two weeks. Earlier week Blackburn magistrates heard in the first attack the girl was punched in the face and grabbed round the throat. In the second she was repeatedly punched and then kicked as she lay on the floor before being kneed in the crutch.
Ian Hindle, 40, of Church Walk, Blackburn, a former BNP activist pleaded guilty to two charges of assaulting Tania Derbyshire. He was remanded in custody for the preparation of a pre-sentence report.
Catherine Allan, prosecuting, said Miss Derbyshire had been in a relationship with Hindle since just after she turned 16 (sixteen) after meeting him through Facebook.
“The prosecution say he has groomed a vulnerable person who has only just turned 18,” said Miss Allan. “He introduced her to drugs and there has been a previous history of violence against her.”
Miss Allan said on the first occasion Miss Derbyshire had gone to his sister’s home and waited for him. “He arrived 30 minutes later, high on drugs, and accused her of cheating on him,” said Miss Allan.
“He punched her on the head and then grabbed her by the throat and pushed her against a wall.”
The second incident happened at Hindle’s home. He dragged Miss Derbyshire upstairs by her hair where he repeatedly kicked and punched her.
Jonathan Taylor, defending, said Hindle was addicted to crack cocaine and that impacted on his behaviour.
Hindle’s mother – Florence Hindle (who was a leading supporter of Nick Griffin) – was secretary of Blackburn BNP branch and stood as a BNP candidate in local elections on numerous occasions, including Mill Hill ward in 2007, where she stood against England First candidate Kevin Shaw. Mr Shaw had been tipped by many to win, but acting on Nick Griffin’s instructions Ms Hindle split the nationalist vote and handed what should have been a nationalist victory to the Labour Party.
Ian Hindle’s first conviction for sex offences was in 2008, when he was given a three-year sentence for offences involving 14-year-old girls. Also sentenced in this 2008 case was Hindle’s fellow BNP activist Andrew Wells, a well-known organised crime figure in the Blackburn area. Perhaps the most serious aspect of this case is that Wells was also involved in recruiting (among both nationalists and criminals) for a security company employed by NATO forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
One of Britain’s most notorious gangsters, who was in the vanguard of violent “anti-fascism”, is beginning an 11-year prison sentence for a series of crimes linked to his organised crime empire. Dominic Noonan (who now spells his name “Domenyk”) presided over a reign of terror in the Manchester and Salford area. He was also convicted of “attempting to pervert the course of justice” after paying the parents of a young boy so that he would not give evidence about Noonan’s alleged sexual offences.
Noonan and his late brother – gangland assassin Dessie Noonan – had close ties to Irish republican terrorists and related “anti-fascist” activity in North West England which was at its peak in the 1990s. Dessie Noonan was killed by a black drug dealer in 2005.
Dominic Noonan – a well-known homosexual – surrounded himself with a coterie of teenage boys, and organised them in an orgy of rioting across Manchester following the death of Dessie’s nephew, black gangster Mark Duggan, in a controversial shooting by London police in 2011.
Heritage and Destiny readers will be familiar with the entire Noonan saga. We are only now able to report Dominic Noonan’s prison sentence – though he was jailed in September last year – because of a contempt of court order restricting reporting until a related case had concluded. Last year Dominic Noonan came to attention after the murder of another local gang boss Paul Massey, who shortly before his death had posted allegations online against Noonan. Massey had also been on the far left, but in the last year of his life had been a UKIP supporter.
Last week Noonan received a further two year sentence for perverting the course of justice, though he was acquitted of “engaging in a sex act in front of a minor”. Last September he was given a nine-year sentence for offences including blackmail and arson.
In 2004 Dominic Noonan was jailed for 9½ years for possession of a firearm: he was released in 2010 but briefly recalled to prison in 2011 for his role in that year’s riots.
While highlighting cases of hooliganism among their opponents (less among genuine nationalists than among the Islam-obsessed EDL and allied groups) “anti-fascists” are not keen to highlight their own close connections with notorious figures in Greater Manchester organised crime. Coincidentally (or perhaps not) while the EDL gangsters and hooligans tend to support Manchester City (despite the club’s ownership by the Muslim ruling family of Abu Dhabi!), their “anti-fascist” opponents tend to be linked to the rival club Manchester United, and even produced an “anti-fascist” football fanzine, Red Attitude.
An interview with Salford gangland assassin Dessie Noonan published in the “anti-fascist” magazine Red Attitude in 1997.
Click on the images to download a larger version.
The most notorious “anti-fascist” gangsters in Greater Manchester were Salford’s Dessie Noonan, responsible for more than twenty gangland killings before his own murder in March 2005, and Manchester’s Paddy Logan, who like Noonan was involved with both Anti-Fascist Action and various Irish republican terrorist gangs before falling victim to an internal criminal feud, shot dead in his own bedroom in July 1999.
Sadly however nationalists must admit that criminality and perversion are not unknown in our own ranks. Ironically in the same week as the latest Noonan case, former BNP activist Ian Hindle was convicted of a second sexual offence in the past few years.
Ian Hindle’s first conviction for sex offences was in 2008, when he was given a three-year sentence for offences involving 14-year-old girls. Also sentenced in this 2008 case was Hindle’s fellow BNP activist Andrew Wells, who was then a well-known organised crime figure in the Blackburn area. Perhaps the most serious aspect of this case is that Wells was also involved in recruiting (among both nationalists and criminals) for a security company employed by NATO forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.